Growers report
CSIRO team
28 May, 2021
Growers details
| Paddock | Organisation | Contact | Farmer | Paddock tested | issues/ comments | Dan’s comments from reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32111 | SFS | Ashley Amourgis | Dennis | Ressi W | Used Yield col VRYIELDMAS. | 0 |
| 32112 | SFS | Ashley Amourgis | Dennis | Ressi E | Used Yield col VRYIELDMAS. | 0 |
| 32125 | SFS | Ashley Amourgis | Keating | Middle Fays | Used Yield col VRYIELDMAS. Nill strip is 1/2 width of others so only using 1 central header run | 0 |
| 32126 | SFS | Ashley Amourgis | Keating | Far Fays | Used Yield col VRYIELDMAS. Nill strip is 1/2 width of others so only using 1 central header run | 0 |
| 32136 | SFS | Ashley Amourgis | Peel | North West | 0 | 0 |
| 32133 | SFS | Ashley Amourgis | Peel | Middle West | Reduced zone due to odd shape. No recommedned rates emailed Sean | 0 |
| 32153 | SFS | Ashley Amourgis | Wills | Oroukes E | Used Yield col VRYIELDMAS. Zone 1 only has yield in the Alt GSP strip. Zones < 1ha | 0 |
| 32154 | SFS | Ashley Amourgis | Wills | Oroukes W | Used Yield col VRYIELDMAS. | 0 |
Extra Notes:
Vallance Naradoon East
Confirmed Map but no yieldVallance Naradoon West
Confirmed Map but no yieldKeating Middle Fays Updated rates but there is a Nill and skinny 0? Need to contact to Ash to proceeded I think we have yld data .
problem with extracted yield data Christina will fix soon?
Site 1
Harvest map
Yield trace
Results
Site 2
Harvest map
Yield trace
### Results
Site 3
Harvest map
Yield trace
Results
Site 4
Harvest map
Yield trace
Results
# Site 5
Harvest map
Yield trace
Results
Site 6
Harvest map
Yield trace
### Results
Site 7
Harvest map
Yield trace
Results
Site 8
Harvest map
Yield trace
Results
Checks for CSIRO
check the rate provided is equivalent to the calculated N/P content.
| Paddock ID | Farmer | Paddock tested | Strip Type | Strip Rate | N content | P content |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32111 | Dennis | Ressi W | P Strip | MAP @ 0kg/ha | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 32111 | Dennis | Ressi W | P Strip | MAP @ 100kg/ha | 10.0 | 22.0 |
| 32111 | Dennis | Ressi W | P Strip | MAP @ 150kg/ha | 15.0 | 33.0 |
| 32112 | Dennis | Ressi E | P Strip | MAP @ 0kg/ha | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 32112 | Dennis | Ressi E | P Strip | MAP @ 100kg/ha | 10.0 | 22.0 |
| 32112 | Dennis | Ressi E | P Strip | MAP @ 150kg/ha | 15.0 | 33.0 |
| 32125 | Keating | Middle Fays | N Strip | Urea @ 0kg/ha | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 32125 | Keating | Middle Fays | N Strip | Urea @ 120kg/ha & Urea @ 120kg/ha | 110.4 | 0.0 |
| 32125 | Keating | Middle Fays | N Strip | Urea @ 240kg/ha & Urea @ 240kg/ha | 220.8 | 0.0 |
| 32126 | Keating | Far Fays | N Strip | Urea @ 0kg/ha | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 32126 | Keating | Far Fays | N Strip | Urea @ 120kg/ha & Urea @ 120kg/ha | 110.4 | 0.0 |
| 32126 | Keating | Far Fays | N Strip | Urea @ 240kg/ha & Urea @ 240kg/ha | 220.8 | 0.0 |
| 32133 | Peel | Middle West | P Strip | MAP @ 0kg/ha | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 32133 | Peel | Middle West | P Strip | MAP @ 50kg/ha | 5.0 | 11.0 |
| 32133 | Peel | Middle West | P Strip | MAP @ 75kg/ha | 7.5 | 16.5 |
| 32136 | Peel | North West | P Strip | MAP @ 0kg/ha | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 32136 | Peel | North West | P Strip | MAP @ 50kg/ha | 5.0 | 11.0 |
| 32136 | Peel | North West | P Strip | MAP @ 75kg/ha | 7.5 | 16.5 |
| 32153 | Wills | Oroukes E | P Strip | MAP @ 0kg/ha | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 32153 | Wills | Oroukes E | P Strip | MAP @ 75kg/ha | 7.5 | 16.5 |
| 32153 | Wills | Oroukes E | P Strip | MAP @ 180kg/ha | 18.0 | 39.6 |
| 32154 | Wills | Oroukes W | P Strip | MAP @ 0kg/ha | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 32154 | Wills | Oroukes W | P Strip | MAP @ 60kg/ha | 6.0 | 13.2 |
| 32154 | Wills | Oroukes W | P Strip | MAP @ 75kg/ha | 7.5 | 16.5 |
Comparison of yield response: Growers standard practice strips (GSP vs Alt GSP)
Ideally the yield would be the same in both strips (GSP and Alt GSP), and / or the yield would not be significantly different.
Significant yield differences between the two strips suggest that there is a high degree of variability between the two strip that were applied with the same fertiliser.
This may occur because the strips have underlying soil, plant growth conditions.
Detailed results of GSP vs Alt GSP
| Zone ID | Zone name | Farmer | Paddock tested | Mean yield difference | Significant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 321111 | Z1 | Dennis | Ressi W | 0.12 | not significant |
| 321112 | Z2 | Dennis | Ressi W | 0.91 | significant |
| 321121 | Z1 | Dennis | Ressi E | 0.35 | significant |
| 321122 | Z2 | Dennis | Ressi E | 1.24 | significant |
| 321331 | Z1 | Peel | Middle West | 0.31 | significant |
| 321332 | Z2 | Peel | Middle West | 0.09 | not significant |
| 321361 | Z1 | Peel | North West | 1.53 | significant |
| 321362 | Z2 | Peel | North West | 0.31 | not significant |
| 321541 | Z1 | Wills | Oroukes W | 0.29 | significant |
| 321542 | Z2 | Wills | Oroukes W | 0.41 | significant |
Comparison of yield response: High medium and low fertiliser rates
Different comparisons are made between high, medium and low fertiliser rates for each zone.
Comparison of yield response in the strip / zone per paddock between:
High fertiliser rate vs low fertiliser rate (yield for high fert rate - yield for low fert rate)
High fertiliser rate vs medium fertiliser rate (yield for high fert rate - yield for medium fert rate)
Medium fertiliser rate vs low fertiliser rate (yield for medium fert rate - yield for low fert rate)
The yield response is classed as ‘positive’ when higher rates of fertiliser results in higher yields.
The yield response is classed as ‘no response’ when higher rates of fertiliser results in no change in yields (this is defined as 0 +/- standard error)
The yield response is classed as ‘negative’ when higher rates of fertiliser results in lower yields.
T- test was also run for each comparison and the significant differences at p < 0.05 reported. Note that some significant values are not reported for the zone, this may occur when there is not enough data points to run the t - test (although there is still have yield values to make a comparison).
The below table shows what fertiliser rates were assigned to low medium and high fertiliser rates.
| paddock ID | Farmer | Paddock tested | rate low | rate medium | rate high | rate very high | Rates used (low med high analysis) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32111 | Dennis | Ressi W | MAP @ 0kg/ha | MAP @ 100kg/ha | MAP @ 150kg/ha | NA | 0,100,150 |
| 32112 | Dennis | Ressi E | MAP @ 0kg/ha | MAP @ 100kg/ha | MAP @ 150kg/ha | NA | 0,100,150 |
| 32125 | Keating | Middle Fays | Urea @ 0kg/ha | Urea @ 120kg/ha & Urea @ 120kg/ha | Urea @ 240kg/ha & Urea @ 240kg/ha | NA | 0,120,240 |
| 32126 | Keating | Far Fays | Urea @ 0kg/ha | Urea @ 120kg/ha & Urea @ 120kg/ha | Urea @ 240kg/ha & Urea @ 240kg/ha | NA | 0,120,240 |
| 32133 | Peel | Middle West | MAP @ 0kg/ha | MAP @ 50kg/ha | MAP @ 75kg/ha | NA | 0,50,75 |
| 32136 | Peel | North West | MAP @ 0kg/ha | MAP @ 50kg/ha | MAP @ 75kg/ha | NA | 0,50,75 |
| 32153 | Wills | Oroukes E | MAP @ 0kg/ha | MAP @ 75kg/ha | MAP @ 180kg/ha | NA | na |
| 32154 | Wills | Oroukes W | MAP @ 0kg/ha | MAP @ 60kg/ha | MAP @ 75kg/ha | NA | 0,60,75 |
High fertiliser rate vs low fertiliser rate.
| Zone ID | zone name | Farmer | Paddock tested | yield response | Significant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 321111 | Z1 1 | Dennis | Ressi W | positive | significant |
| 321112 | Z2 2 | Dennis | Ressi W | negative | significant |
| 321121 | Z1 | Dennis | Ressi E | negative | significant |
| 321122 | Z2 | Dennis | Ressi E | positive | significant |
| 321251 | Z1 | Keating | Middle Fays | positive | significant |
| 321252 | Z2 | Keating | Middle Fays | positive | significant |
| 321261 | Z1 | Keating | Far Fays | negative | not significant |
| 321262 | Z2 | Keating | Far Fays | positive | significant |
| 321331 | Z1 | Peel | Middle West | no_response | not significant |
| 321332 | Z2 | Peel | Middle West | negative | not significant |
| 321361 | Z1 | Peel | North West | positive | significant |
| 321362 | Z2 | Peel | North West | positive | not significant |
| 321532 | Z2 | Wills | Oroukes E | negative | significant |
| 321541 | Z1 | Wills | Oroukes W | negative | significant |
| 321542 | Z2 | Wills | Oroukes W | negative | significant |
High fertiliser rate vs medium fertiliser rate.
| Zone ID | zone name | Farmer | Paddock tested | yield response | Significant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 321111 | Z1 1 | Dennis | Ressi W | positive | significant |
| 321112 | Z2 2 | Dennis | Ressi W | positive | significant |
| 321121 | Z1 | Dennis | Ressi E | negative | not significant |
| 321122 | Z2 | Dennis | Ressi E | positive | significant |
| 321251 | Z1 | Keating | Middle Fays | negative | significant |
| 321252 | Z2 | Keating | Middle Fays | negative | significant |
| 321261 | Z1 | Keating | Far Fays | negative | not significant |
| 321262 | Z2 | Keating | Far Fays | positive | significant |
| 321331 | Z1 | Peel | Middle West | negative | significant |
| 321332 | Z2 | Peel | Middle West | negative | not significant |
| 321361 | Z1 | Peel | North West | positive | significant |
| 321362 | Z2 | Peel | North West | positive | significant |
| 321532 | Z2 | Wills | Oroukes E | positive | significant |
| 321541 | Z1 | Wills | Oroukes W | negative | significant |
| 321542 | Z2 | Wills | Oroukes W | negative | significant |
Medium fertiliser rate vs low fertiliser rate.
| Zone ID | zone name | Farmer | Paddock tested | yield response | Significant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 321111 | Z1 1 | Dennis | Ressi W | negative | significant |
| 321112 | Z2 2 | Dennis | Ressi W | negative | significant |
| 321121 | Z1 | Dennis | Ressi E | negative | significant |
| 321122 | Z2 | Dennis | Ressi E | negative | significant |
| 321251 | Z1 | Keating | Middle Fays | positive | significant |
| 321252 | Z2 | Keating | Middle Fays | positive | significant |
| 321261 | Z1 | Keating | Far Fays | negative | not significant |
| 321262 | Z2 | Keating | Far Fays | negative | significant |
| 321331 | Z1 | Peel | Middle West | positive | significant |
| 321332 | Z2 | Peel | Middle West | negative | not significant |
| 321361 | Z1 | Peel | North West | positive | significant |
| 321362 | Z2 | Peel | North West | negative | significant |
| 321532 | Z2 | Wills | Oroukes E | negative | significant |
| 321541 | Z1 | Wills | Oroukes W | positive | significant |
| 321542 | Z2 | Wills | Oroukes W | positive | not significant |
Comparison of yield response: the growers fertilisers rate of application vs. higher or lower fertilisers rates.
Different comparisons are made between the growers standard practice and fertilisers strips for each zone.
Comparison of yield response in the strip / zone per paddock between:
- Growers standard practice GSP vs low fertiliser rate (yield for GSP fert rate - yield for low fert rate)
- Growers standard practice GSP fertiliser rate vs high fertiliser rate (yield for GSP fert rate - yield for high fert rate)
The yield response is classed as ‘positive’ when higher rates of fertiliser results in higher yields
The yield response is classed as ‘no response’ when higher rates of fertiliser results in no change in yields (this is defined as 0 +/- standard error)
The yield response is classed as ‘negative’ when higher rates of fertiliser results in lower yields.
T- test was also run for each comparison and the significant differences at p < 0.05 reported. Note that some significant values are not reported for the zone, this may occur when there is not enough data points to run the t - test (although there is still have yield values to make a comparison).
The below table details what rates were excluded from the analysis. For sites with more than 3 rates one strip rate was exuded from the analysis.
If this should be a different rate and not the one excluded the analysis will need to be re - run. Please make a note.
GSP vs higher fertiliser rates
The rates were used for the analysis
| Zone ID | Farmer | Paddock tested | GSP rate | higher than GSP rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 321111 | Dennis | Ressi W | 100 | 150 |
| 321112 | Dennis | Ressi W | 100 | 150 |
| 321121 | Dennis | Ressi E | 100 | 150 |
| 321122 | Dennis | Ressi E | 100 | 150 |
| 321251 | Keating | Middle Fays | 120 | 240 |
| 321252 | Keating | Middle Fays | 120 | 240 |
| 321261 | Keating | Far Fays | 120 | 240 |
| 321262 | Keating | Far Fays | 120 | 240 |
| 321331 | Peel | Middle West | 50 | 75 |
| 321332 | Peel | Middle West | 50 | 75 |
| 321361 | Peel | North West | 50 | 75 |
| 321362 | Peel | North West | 50 | 75 |
| 321532 | Wills | Oroukes E | 75 | 180 |
The results for the analysis
| Zone ID | zone name | Farmer | Paddock tested | yield response | Significant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 321111 | Z1 1 | Dennis | Ressi W | positive | significant |
| 321112 | Z2 2 | Dennis | Ressi W | positive | significant |
| 321121 | Z1 | Dennis | Ressi E | negative | not significant |
| 321122 | Z2 | Dennis | Ressi E | positive | significant |
| 321251 | Z1 | Keating | Middle Fays | negative | significant |
| 321252 | Z2 | Keating | Middle Fays | negative | significant |
| 321261 | Z1 | Keating | Far Fays | negative | not significant |
| 321262 | Z2 | Keating | Far Fays | positive | significant |
| 321331 | Z1 | Peel | Middle West | negative | significant |
| 321332 | Z2 | Peel | Middle West | negative | not significant |
| 321361 | Z1 | Peel | North West | positive | significant |
| 321362 | Z2 | Peel | North West | positive | significant |
| 321532 | Z2 | Wills | Oroukes E | positive | significant |
GSP vs lower fertiliser rates
The rates were used for the analysis
| Zone ID | zone name | Farmer | Paddock tested | GSP rate | lower than GSP rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 321111 | Z1 1 | Dennis | Ressi W | 100 | 0 |
| 321112 | Z2 2 | Dennis | Ressi W | 100 | 0 |
| 321121 | Z1 | Dennis | Ressi E | 100 | 0 |
| 321122 | Z2 | Dennis | Ressi E | 100 | 0 |
| 321251 | Z1 | Keating | Middle Fays | 120 | 0 |
| 321252 | Z2 | Keating | Middle Fays | 120 | 0 |
| 321261 | Z1 | Keating | Far Fays | 120 | 0 |
| 321262 | Z2 | Keating | Far Fays | 120 | 0 |
| 321331 | Z1 | Peel | Middle West | 50 | 0 |
| 321332 | Z2 | Peel | Middle West | 50 | 0 |
| 321361 | Z1 | Peel | North West | 50 | 0 |
| 321362 | Z2 | Peel | North West | 50 | 0 |
| 321532 | Z2 | Wills | Oroukes E | 75 | 0 |
| 321541 | Z1 | Wills | Oroukes W | 75 | 0 |
| 321542 | Z2 | Wills | Oroukes W | 75 | 0 |
The results for the analysis
| Zone ID | zone name | Farmer | Paddock tested | yield response | Significant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 321111 | Z1 1 | Dennis | Ressi W | negative | significant |
| 321112 | Z2 2 | Dennis | Ressi W | negative | significant |
| 321121 | Z1 | Dennis | Ressi E | negative | significant |
| 321122 | Z2 | Dennis | Ressi E | negative | significant |
| 321251 | Z1 | Keating | Middle Fays | positive | significant |
| 321252 | Z2 | Keating | Middle Fays | positive | significant |
| 321261 | Z1 | Keating | Far Fays | negative | not significant |
| 321262 | Z2 | Keating | Far Fays | negative | significant |
| 321331 | Z1 | Peel | Middle West | positive | significant |
| 321332 | Z2 | Peel | Middle West | negative | not significant |
| 321361 | Z1 | Peel | North West | positive | significant |
| 321362 | Z2 | Peel | North West | negative | significant |
| 321532 | Z2 | Wills | Oroukes E | negative | significant |
| 321541 | Z1 | Wills | Oroukes W | negative | significant |
| 321542 | Z2 | Wills | Oroukes W | negative | significant |
Comparison of yield response: The closest match to recommended fertiliser rates compared to higher and lower fertiliser rates.
The soil test results results in a recommended N and P rate.
Sean has done these calculations.
The recommended fertiliser rate was not always implemented, so I have worked out the closest match.
The approx recommended rate:
A = recommend rate - abs(rate 1)
B = recommend rate - abs(rate 2)
C = rate - abs(rate 3)
Then work out which has the smallest value A, B or C, this will be the approx recommended rate.
Then I assigned a rate lower and a rate higher than recommend rate for the comparison.
Higher and lower rates won’t always exist, for some paddocks.
In some cases the rates will all be higher or all be lower, while for other paddocks there will be choice to be made (which rates should be used).
If we need to choose what rates to induced it is best to use this rough rule:
- Avoid 0 rates (won’t always be practical)
- lower rate should be close to half the recommended rate
- higher rate should be close to double the rate.
Comparison of yield response in the strip / zone per paddock between:
Approx recommend rate vs lower fertiliser rate
(yield for app rec fertiliser rate - yield for lower fertiliser rate)
Approx recommend rate fertiliser rate vs higher fertiliser rate
(yield for app rec fertiliser rate - yield for higher fertiliser rate)
The results:
The yield response is classed as ‘positive’ when higher rates of fertiliser results in higher yields
The yield response is classed as ‘no response’ when higher rates of fertiliser results in no change in yields (this is defined as 0 +/- standard error)
The yield response is classed as ‘negative’ when higher rates of fertiliser results in lower yields.
T- test was also run for each comparison and the significant differences at p < 0.05 reported. Note that some significant values are not reported for the zone, this may occur when there is not enough data points to run the t - test (although there is still have yield values to make a comparison).
The below table details what rates were excluded from the analysis.
If this should be a different rate and not the one excluded the analysis will need to be re - run. Please make a note.
Approx recommended rate vs higher fertiliser rates
The rates were used for the analysis
| Zone ID | Paddock tested | Strip Type | approx recommed rate | higher than recommed rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 321111 | Ressi W | P Strip | MAP @ 0kg/ha | MAP @ 100kg/ha |
| 321112 | Ressi W | P Strip | MAP @ 0kg/ha | MAP @ 100kg/ha |
| 321121 | Ressi E | P Strip | MAP @ 0kg/ha | MAP @ 100kg/ha |
| 321122 | Ressi E | P Strip | MAP @ 0kg/ha | MAP @ 100kg/ha |
| 321331 | Middle West | P Strip | MAP @ 0kg/ha | MAP @ 50kg/ha |
| 321332 | Middle West | P Strip | MAP @ 0kg/ha | MAP @ 50kg/ha |
| 321361 | North West | P Strip | MAP @ 50kg/ha | MAP @ 75kg/ha |
| 321362 | North West | P Strip | MAP @ 50kg/ha | MAP @ 75kg/ha |
| 321532 | Oroukes E | P Strip | MAP @ 0kg/ha | MAP @ 75kg/ha |
| 321541 | Oroukes W | P Strip | MAP @ 0kg/ha | MAP @ 60kg/ha |
| 321542 | Oroukes W | P Strip | MAP @ 0kg/ha | MAP @ 60kg/ha |
The results for the analysis
| Zone ID | Zone name | Paddock tested | Strip Type | yield response | Significant practical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 321111 | Z1 1 | Ressi W | P Strip | negative | significant |
| 321112 | Z2 2 | Ressi W | P Strip | negative | significant |
| 321121 | Z1 | Ressi E | P Strip | negative | significant |
| 321122 | Z2 | Ressi E | P Strip | negative | significant |
| 321331 | Z1 | Middle West | P Strip | positive | significant |
| 321332 | Z2 | Middle West | P Strip | negative | not significant |
| 321361 | Z1 | North West | P Strip | positive | significant |
| 321362 | Z2 | North West | P Strip | positive | significant |
| 321532 | Z2 | Oroukes E | P Strip | negative | significant |
| 321541 | Z1 | Oroukes W | P Strip | positive | significant |
| 321542 | Z2 | Oroukes W | P Strip | positive | not significant |
Approx recommended rate vs lower fertiliser rates
The rates were used for the analysis
| Zone ID | Paddock tested | Strip Type | approx recommed rate | lower than recommed rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 321361 | North West | P Strip | MAP @ 50kg/ha | MAP @ 0kg/ha |
| 321362 | North West | P Strip | MAP @ 50kg/ha | MAP @ 0kg/ha |
| 321251 | Middle Fays | N Strip | Urea @ 240kg/ha & Urea @ 240kg/ha | Urea @ 120kg/ha & Urea @ 120kg/ha |
| 321252 | Middle Fays | N Strip | Urea @ 240kg/ha & Urea @ 240kg/ha | Urea @ 120kg/ha & Urea @ 120kg/ha |
| 321261 | Far Fays | N Strip | Urea @ 240kg/ha & Urea @ 240kg/ha | Urea @ 120kg/ha & Urea @ 120kg/ha |
| 321262 | Far Fays | N Strip | Urea @ 240kg/ha & Urea @ 240kg/ha | Urea @ 120kg/ha & Urea @ 120kg/ha |
The results for the analysis
| Zone ID | Zone name | Paddock tested | Strip Type | yield response | Significant practical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 321361 | Z1 | North West | P Strip | positive | significant |
| 321362 | Z2 | North West | P Strip | negative | significant |
| 321251 | Z1 | Middle Fays | N Strip | negative | significant |
| 321252 | Z2 | Middle Fays | N Strip | negative | significant |
| 321261 | Z1 | Far Fays | N Strip | negative | not significant |
| 321262 | Z2 | Far Fays | N Strip | positive | significant |
Action required :
Review that the results look sensible and nothing needs re running - are the reports OK to send off?
The fertiliser applied has translated correctly to units of N or P.
Are the rates included in the comparison analysis sensible and what you want.
Are the paddocks to be included in the economics analysis?
Notes should be made in the below file:
Couple of checks and comments from Sean and Harms database.
| Zone ID | Paddock tested | Zone | p rec | Comment Soil P | n rec | Comment Soil N | Comment Plant Tissue | n_rec_yld_low | n_rec_yld_med | n_rec_yld_high |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 321111 | Ressi W | Z1 1 | 10 | NA | 178.66 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 178.66 |
| 321112 | Ressi W | Z2 2 | 10 | NA | 117.49 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 117.49 |
| 321121 | Ressi E | Z1 | 5 | NA | 129.27 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 129.27 |
| 321122 | Ressi E | Z2 | 5 | NA | 189.27 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 189.27 |
| 321251 | Middle Fays | Z1 | 5 | NA | 394.47 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 394.47 |
| 321252 | Middle Fays | Z2 | 10 | NA | 363.84 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 363.84 |
| 321261 | Far Fays | Z1 | 30 | NA | 269.70 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 269.70 |
| 321262 | Far Fays | Z2 | 15 | NA | 263.90 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 263.90 |
| 321331 | Middle West | Z1 | 0 | NA | 220.15 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 220.15 |
| 321332 | Middle West | Z2 | 0 | NA | 224.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 224.00 |
| 321361 | North West | Z1 | 7 | NA | 354.90 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 354.90 |
| 321362 | North West | Z2 | 6 | NA | 332.46 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 332.46 |
| 321531 | Oroukes E | Z1 | 30 | NA | 13.50 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 13.50 |
| 321532 | Oroukes E | Z2 | 8 | NA | 225.80 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 225.80 |
| 321541 | Oroukes W | Z1 | 5 | NA | 271.94 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 271.94 |
| 321542 | Oroukes W | Z2 | 5 | NA | 325.54 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 325.54 |
Comments from the spatial data